<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My review of Johan Norberg&#8217;s Financial Fiasco is out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2009/12/14/my-review-of-johan-norbergs-financial-fiasco-is-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2009/12/14/my-review-of-johan-norbergs-financial-fiasco-is-out/</link>
	<description>A voice of reason against illiberal nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 03:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Labour&#8217;s electoral strategy&#8217; &#8211; and a call for Empiricism &#171; Freethinking Economist</title>
		<link>http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2009/12/14/my-review-of-johan-norbergs-financial-fiasco-is-out/#comment-4329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8216;Labour&#8217;s electoral strategy&#8217; &#8211; and a call for Empiricism &#171; Freethinking Economist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 10:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethinkingeconomist.com/?p=1029#comment-4329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the whole cause of the financial crisis. Sure, you can &#8216;construct a narrative&#8217; (read my review of Norberg for an example).  But is it true?  Barry Ritholtz takes it to pieces &#8211; see this post on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the whole cause of the financial crisis. Sure, you can &#8216;construct a narrative&#8217; (read my review of Norberg for an example).  But is it true?  Barry Ritholtz takes it to pieces &#8211; see this post on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy &#187; China is a very bad model for the left</title>
		<link>http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2009/12/14/my-review-of-johan-norbergs-financial-fiasco-is-out/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberal Conspiracy &#187; China is a very bad model for the left]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethinkingeconomist.com/?p=1029#comment-1452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] So pointing at China and simplistically saying &#8220;look, they have lots of government spending and lots of growth, QED&#8221; is stupid. You might as well point to Angola and its 12%+ oil-driven growth, and it would tell you as much about the UK&#8217;s situation (we, after all, still possess some reserves of North Sea Oil). Indeed, if one wants proof that government spending leads to economic recovery, why not turn to history and take the case of America&#8217;s New Deal? (h/t) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So pointing at China and simplistically saying &#8220;look, they have lots of government spending and lots of growth, QED&#8221; is stupid. You might as well point to Angola and its 12%+ oil-driven growth, and it would tell you as much about the UK&#8217;s situation (we, after all, still possess some reserves of North Sea Oil). Indeed, if one wants proof that government spending leads to economic recovery, why not turn to history and take the case of America&#8217;s New Deal? (h/t) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Conscience</title>
		<link>http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2009/12/14/my-review-of-johan-norbergs-financial-fiasco-is-out/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Conscience]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethinkingeconomist.com/?p=1029#comment-1451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] So pointing at China and simplistically saying &#8220;look, they have lots of government spending and lots of growth, QED&#8221; is stupid. You might as well point to Angola and its 12%+ oil-driven growth, and it would tell you as much about the UK&#8217;s situation (we, after all, still possess some reserves of North Sea Oil). Indeed, if one wants proof that government spending leads to economic recovery, why not turn to history and take the case of America&#8217;s New Deal? That at least tells you something about relatively comparable economies and circumstances &#8211; though again one would need to adjust for contemporary actuality and the complex nature of macroeconomic recovery. (h/t) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So pointing at China and simplistically saying &#8220;look, they have lots of government spending and lots of growth, QED&#8221; is stupid. You might as well point to Angola and its 12%+ oil-driven growth, and it would tell you as much about the UK&#8217;s situation (we, after all, still possess some reserves of North Sea Oil). Indeed, if one wants proof that government spending leads to economic recovery, why not turn to history and take the case of America&#8217;s New Deal? That at least tells you something about relatively comparable economies and circumstances &#8211; though again one would need to adjust for contemporary actuality and the complex nature of macroeconomic recovery. (h/t) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freethinkingeconomist</title>
		<link>http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2009/12/14/my-review-of-johan-norbergs-financial-fiasco-is-out/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[freethinkingeconomist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethinkingeconomist.com/?p=1029#comment-851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that Niklas.  Johan Norberg is a gentleman.  I don&#039;t agree at the end, and I think 60 years of generally strong growth since governments have become less laissez faire goes against his views.  But he is a scholar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Niklas.  Johan Norberg is a gentleman.  I don&#8217;t agree at the end, and I think 60 years of generally strong growth since governments have become less laissez faire goes against his views.  But he is a scholar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Smith</title>
		<link>http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2009/12/14/my-review-of-johan-norbergs-financial-fiasco-is-out/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niklas Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freethinkingeconomist.com/?p=1029#comment-849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting review - congratulations on getting it published in the FT! Johan Norberg responds to your review here: http://www.johannorberg.net/?page=displayblog&amp;month=12&amp;year=2009#3406]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting review &#8211; congratulations on getting it published in the FT! Johan Norberg responds to your review here: <a href="http://www.johannorberg.net/?page=displayblog&#038;month=12&#038;year=2009#3406" rel="nofollow">http://www.johannorberg.net/?page=displayblog&#038;month=12&#038;year=2009#3406</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

